Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Value Integration amongst Students of Social Work: Challenges and Way Forward

Abstract

Values form an integral component of the social work profession. In fact, values provide the framework within which social work professionals make decisions and create meaningful and inclusive interventions for their client systems. Consequently, facilitating and promoting value integration must comprise the core component of teaching and learning in this profession. In its early stages of progression, a quest for acceptance shifted the primary thrust of professional social work to  developing a scientific knowledge base and skills, at the expense of focusing on its values. Over time, factors such as value plurality, limited ‘values’ focus and pedagogical challenges in values training, and the dominance of generic, universal, and Western value sets emerged as significant roadblocks in values-based practice. The authors contend that this has led to an ongoing diminution of values teaching and integration in schools of social work, made more critical in the contemporary neoliberal context of professional practice. Based on a descriptive exploratory research study, the paper focuses on a school of social work in Delhi, India. It assumes a critical view of the value transactions that take place in the classroom and field settings and explores the manner in which values are imbibed and practised by the students; the challenges and ethical dilemmas experienced by them; and the mechanisms deployed by them to resolve such dilemmas. Centred on the perspectives of students and educators, the paper examines the nature and process of value integration. It proposes ways to consolidate the value base of social work education and practice.

Keywords

Values , Value Integration, Social Work Education, Ethical Dilemmas

pdf

Author Biography

Neera Agnimitra

Dr Neera Agnimitra earned a PhD and M.Phil. in Social Work. Her teaching and research interests include community work and community development; environmental social work; disaster management; and gender and health-related social work practice. With an MPhil specialisation in social work education, she has a keen interest in field practicum, student supervision, ethics, and value-based teaching and learning.

Seema Sharma

Dr Seema Sharma is a PhD and an M.Phil. in Social Work. Her teaching and research interests include social development and social exclusion, social identity, human resource management and labour, corporate social responsibility, social entrepreneurship, and ethics and values in social work education.

Tejaswin Sharma

Tejaswin Sharma is an M.Phil.  and is currently registered as a doctoral student in the Department of Social Work, University of Delhi. His areas of interest include values and ethics in social work education, mental health, gender and sexuality, and organisational behaviour.


References

  1. Agnimitra, N. and Sharma, S. (2022). Social work in difficult times: emerging value frame in India, Social Work Education, 1-18, DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2022.2088726
  2. Attrash-Najjar, A. and Strier, R. (2020). Moral Distress and Privatisation: Lost in Neoliberal Transition. Ethics and Social Welfare, 14(1), 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2020.1720107
  3. Banks, S. (1995). Ethics and Values in Social Work. BASW, Macmillan Press.
  4. Banks, S. (2008). Critical Commentary: Social Work Ethics. The British Journal of Social Work, 38(6), 1238–1249. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23724057
  5. Banks, S. (2021). Ethics and Values in Social Work (5th Ed.). Bloomsberry Publishing Plc.
  6. Banks, S., and Williams, R. (2005). Accounting for ethical difficulties in social welfare work: Issues, problems and dilemmas, British Journal of Social Work, 35 (7), pp. 1005-22.
  7. Bargal, D. (1981). Social values in social work: A developmental model. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 8(1), 45-61.
  8. Barnes, D., and R. Hugman. 2002. Portrait of Social Work. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16 (3), 277–288.
  9. Bisman, C. (2004). Social Work Values: The Moral Core of the Profession. British Journal of Social Work,34(1),109-123. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bch008.
  10. Brint, S. (1994). In an Age of Experts: The Changing Roles of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton University Press.
  11. Butler-Warke, A., Yuill, C., and Bolger, J. (2020). The changing face of social work: social worker perceptions of a neo-liberalising profession. Critical and Radical Social Work, 8(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986019X15633629305936
  12. Congress, E. (1999). Social work values and ethics: Identifying and resolving professional dilemmas. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth.
  13. Dlamini, T. T., and V. Sewpaul. 2015. Rhetoric Versus Reality in Social Work Practice: Political, Neoliberal, and New Managerial Influences. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk ,50 (4), 467–481.
  14. Fazzi, L. (2016). Are We Educating Creative Professionals? The Results of Some Experiments on the Education of Social Work Students in Italy. Social Work Education 35 (1), 89–99.
  15. Fenton, J. (2019). ‘Four’s a Crowd’? Making Sense of Neoliberalism, Ethical Stress, Moral Courage and Resilience. Ethics and Social Welfare, 14(1), 6–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2019.1675738.
  16. Fisher, J. (1981). Social Work Revolution. Social Work, 26(3). 199-207.
  17. Flexner, A. (1915). Is Social Work a Profession? In Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections. The New School of Philanthropy. 576-590.
  18. Gómez-García, R., Lucas-García, J., and Bayón-Calvo, S. (2021). Social workers’ approaches to ethical dilemmas. Journal of Social Work, 22(3), 804-823. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173211010251 (Original work published 2022)
  19. Gordan, W. E. (1965). Toward a Social Work Frame of Reference. Journal of Education for Social Work,1(2), 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220612.1965.10778665.
  20. Gray, M., and Webb, S. A. (2010). Ethics and Value Perspectives in Social Work. New South Wales, Palgrave Macmillan.
  21. Guttmann, D. (2013). Ethics in Social Work: A Context of Caring (Kindle Edition). Routledge.
  22. Gustafson, J. M. (1982). Theology and Ethics. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  23. Hyslop, I. (2016). Neoliberalism and social work identity. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 20–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255927.
  24. International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW). (2014). Global definition of social work. http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-of-social-work.
  25. Kiuckhohn, O. (1951). Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action', in Parsons, T. and Shils, E. W. (Eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  26. Kutchins, H. (1991). The fiduciary relationship: The legal basis for social workers' responsibilities to clients. Social Work, 36(2), 106–113.
  27. Lafrance, J., Grey, E., and Herbert, M. (2004). Gate Keeping for Professional Social Work Practice. Social Work Education,23(3), 325-340. DOI: 10.1080/0261547042000224065.
  28. Margolin, L. (1997). Under the Cover of Kindness: The Invention of Social Work.Charlottesville, Virginia, University Press of Virginia.
  29. McMilan, N. (2020). Moral Distress in Residential Child Care. Ethics and Social Welfare,14(1), 52-64.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2019.1709878
  30. National Association of Professional Social Workers in India. (2015). Code of Ethics. On National Association of Professional Social Workers in India. Retrieved on 12th September 2024, from: https://www.napswi.org/pdf/NAPSWI_Code_of_Ethics).pdf
  31. Papouli, E. (2019). Moral courage and moral distress in social work education and practice: A literature review’, in Marson, S. M., McKinney, R. E. (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Social Work Ethics and Values, Abingdon, Routledge.
  32. Petrucijová, J., Glumbíková, K., Féher, B., Vályi, R., Ciczkowska, G., Małgorzata, K., Jatczak, I., Kantowicz, E., Zmysłowska, M., Marynowicz, H., Ewa, S., Miriam, M., and Letovancová, K. (2021). Values Building Toolkit in Social Work Education. Ostrava.
  33. Reamer, F. G. (1995). Social Work Values and Ethics. New York, Columbia University Press.
  34. Reamer, F. G. (2019). Essential ethics knowledge in social work. In S. M. Marson and R. E. McKinney (Eds), The Routledge handbook of social work ethics and values (pp. 468–479). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429438813
  35. Reamer, F. G.(2021). Boundary Issues and Dual Relationships in the Human Services, 3rd edn, New York, NY, Columbia University Press
  36. Reisch, M. (2019). Lessons from Social Work’s History for a Tumultuous Era, Social Service Review 93(4), 581-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/706741
  37. Richmond, M. E. (1930). The long view. Philadelphia, PA, Russell Sage Foundation.
  38. Rokeach, M. M. (1979). From Individual to Institutional Values: With Special Reference to the Values of Science', In Rokeach, M. M. (Ed.), Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal. New York, NY, The Free Press.
  39. Sharma, S. (2015). Fieldwork supervision: Meeting requirements of social work education through critical thinking. The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work 49 (1), 3-14.
  40. Shdaimah, C. S., and Strier, R. (2020). Ethical Conflicts in Social Work Practice: Challenges and Opportunities. Ethics and Social Welfare,14(1), 1-5. DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2020.1718848
  41. Siporin, M. (1975). Introduction to Social Work Practice. New York, Macmillan Publishing Co.
  42. Specht, H, and Courtney, M. (1994). Unfaithful Angels: How Social Work has abandoned its Mission. New York.
  43. Vigilante, J. L. (1974). Between Values and Science: Education for the Profession During a Moral Crisis or Is Proof Truth? Journal of Education for Social Work,10(3), 107-115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23038507
  44. Woodward, R., and Mackay, K. (2011). Mind the Gap! Students’ Understanding and Application of Social Work Values. Social Work Education, 31(8), 1090–1104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.608252
  45. Yuill, C. (2018). Social workers and alienation: the compassionate self and the disappointed juggler. Critical and Radical Social Work, 6(3), 275-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204986018X15388225375247

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.