Main Article Content
The structure of political opportunities was the study basis for determining the type of civil subjectivity based on the parameters of political competence (awareness) of the population living in the regions of Russia. The representatives of the expert groups from Belgorod region, Moscow region, the city of Moscow, Bryansk region, Vladimir region, Voronezh region, Lipetsk region, Orel region, Ivanovo region, Ryazan region, Yaroslavl region, Kostroma region, Tambov region, Tver region, Tula region took part in the research. This study has enabled the researchers to determine the preferred model of the political participation for each type of the region in the Russian Federation.Consequently, to suggest for recommendations, which will help to synchronise the structure of the political opportunities with the parameters of constructive political participation, which will lead to increasing the consolidation of the elite and mass groups and to deradicalisation of political interactions. It was proved, that it could be methodologically justified to view the category “political participation” in connection with the category “political activity”. On the basis of the main attributes of the activity, an operationalisation of the concept of “political participation” was conducted.
Taking into account that the regions of the Russian Federation even within the boundaries of one Federal District differ from each other in levels of social and economic development, “structure of political possibilities”, types of the elite and mass value systems, the forms, directivity and effectiveness of the local initiatives also vary considerably. The complex research enabled the authors to verify the validity of the conclusions. The research employed a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.
The results of the expert survey demonstrated that the specificity of any form of political participation is determined by several factors: the political context, the social context, culture, a historical process and a level of political consciousness.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Dalton, R. (2009). The Good Citizen: How A Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. Revised Edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (1999). Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ekman, J. and AmnÃ¥, E. (2009). Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards A New Typology. Youth & Society (YeS). Working Paper. No. 2
Koopmans, R. (1995). Democracy from Below.New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany. Boulder: Westview Press.
Lane, D.S. Dal Cin, S. V. (2018). Sharing beyond Slacktivism: the effect of socially observable prosocial media sharing on subsequent offline helping behavior. Information Communication and Society, Vol. 21, Issue 11: 1523-1540
Macedo, S. (2005). Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do About It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D., Zald, M.N. (2004). Comparative perspectives on social movements: political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scharpf, F. (2000).Institutions in Comparative Policy Research.Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33: 783-784.
Stoker, G. (2006). Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wang, T. and Shen, F. (2018). Perceived party polarization, news attentiveness, and political participation: a mediated moderation model. Asian Journal of Communication, Vol. 28, Issue 6: 620-637
Warren, M.E. (2011). Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, Vol. 105: 683-701.
Xue, T. and van Stekelenburg, J. (2018).When the Internet meets collective action: The traditional and creative ways of political participation in China.Current Sociology, Vol. 66, Issue 6: 911-928