Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023)
New Day Starts in the Dark: Vision for the Post-Pandemic BRICS Education

Special Articles

Adopting a Soft Transdisciplinary Approach via Inquiry/Project Based Learning: A Focus on Legal Education

https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v11i1.1350

Published 2023-06-28

  • Steve Greenfield
    • ,
  • Ewelina Niemczyk

Steve Greenfield
Professor of Sports Law and Practice, Westminster Law School, 4-12 Little Titchfield Street, London W1W 7BY & Extraordinary Professor, Edu-HRight Research Unit North-West University, South Africa

Ewelina Niemczyk
Professor, Comparative and International Studies, Faculty of Education, North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa, Research Unit: Education and Human Rights in Diversity

Abstract

Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic brought to the fore fundamental changes and challenges in education. This is also clear within legal education in BRICS countries and beyond, where issues emerged but created space for effective ways forward. In alignment with the special issue theme, this paper provides a vision for post-pandemic education – in this case, in one discipline, namely legal education. Based on an international literature review, it is argued that to deliver appropriate skills and create well-rounded graduates effectively, there is a need to rework the vision of law as a single discipline. Thus, considering the contemporary challenges to legal education described in this paper, a different approach to the curriculum is required in which support for the development of vital skills such as creativity, critical thinking and complex problem-solving is maximised. Furthermore, attention needs to be devoted to adopting a transdisciplinary perspective delivered through inquiry-based learning. This requires thinking about problem-solving from multiple viewpoints and seeking out tools, practices and pieces of knowledge from multiple fields to arrive at better questions and solutions.

Keywords

Legal Education, Law Teaching, Transdisciplinary Approach, Inquiry-based Learning, Traditional Law Model, Socio-Legal Studies

pdf

References

  1. Aderibigbe, S. A., Dias, J. M., & Abraham, M. S. (2021). Understanding issues affecting students’ commitment to online discussion forums in undergraduate courses. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(01), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i01.17939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i01.17939
  2. Allmer, T. (2018). Precarious, always-on and flexible: A case study of academics as information workers. European Journal of Communication, 33(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118783794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118783794
  3. Annan, K. A. (2009). Problems without passports. Foreign Policy Magazine. https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/09/problems-without-passports/
  4. Ashford, C. (2020). Law Teaching and the coronavirus pandemic. The Law Teacher, 54(2), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2020.1762338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2020.1762338
  5. Balsiger, J. (2015). Transdisciplinarity in the class room? Simulating the co-production of sustainability knowledge. Futures, 65, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.005
  6. Batty, R. (2013). Well there’s your problem – the case for using PBL to teach law to business students. The Law Teacher, 47(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2013.790152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2013.790152
  7. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
  8. Biasutti, M., & EL-Deghaidy, H. (2015). Interdisciplinary project-based learning: an online wiki experience in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 339–355. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/157842/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.899510
  9. Boon, A., Flood, J., & Webb, J. (2005) Postmodern professions? The fragmentation of legal education and the legal profession. Journal of Law and Society, 32(3), 473–492. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3557242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00333.x
  10. Bridges, W. (2009). Managing transitions: Making the most of change, 3rd ed. Nicholas Brealey.
  11. Burton, M., & Watkins, D. (2020). Interdisciplinary approaches and collaboration in legal education in England and Wales in Key Directions in Emma Jones & Fiona Cownie Legal Education National and International Perspectives. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429448065-3
  12. Cetinkaya, L. (2017). The impact of WhatsApp use on success in education process. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3279
  13. Chu, S., Reynolds, R., Tavares, N., Notari, M., & Lee, C. (2017a). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2481-8
  14. Chu, S. K. W., Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Chan, C. K., Lee, C. W. Y., Zou, E., & Lau, W. (2017b). The effectiveness of wikis for project-based learning in different disciplines in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.005
  15. Chupp, M. G., Fletcher, A. M., & Graulty, J. P. (2021). Toward authentic university-community engagement. Journal of Community Practice, 29(4), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2021.1992556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2021.1992556
  16. Collier, R. (2004). “We’re all socio-legal now?” Legal education, scholarship and the “global knowledge economy” – Reflections on the UK experience. Sydney Law Review, 26(4), 503–536. http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/LegEdDig/2005/23.html
  17. Gallo, M. L. (2013). Higher education over a lifespan: A gown to grave assessment of a lifelong relationship between universities and their graduates. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1150-1161. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1023246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.833029
  18. Gantt, L. O. Natt II. (2012). The pedagogy of problem solving: Applying cognitive science to teaching legal problem solving. Creighton Law Review, 45(4), 699–762. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2602856
  19. Gilal, F. G., Channa, N. A., Gilal, N. G., Gilal, R. G., & Shah, S. M. M. (2019). Association between a teacher’s work passion and a student’s work passion: a moderated mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 889–900. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S212004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S212004
  20. Good, A. (2004). “Undoubtedly an expert”? Anthropologists in British asylum courts. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 10(1), 113–133. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2004.00182.x
  21. Good, A. (2008). Cultural evidence in courts of law. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14, S47–S60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20203797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00492.x
  22. Greenhalgh-Spencer, H., Frias K., & Ertas, A. (2017). Transdisciplinary content pedagogy in undergraduate engineering education: Being pulled up short. Transdisciplinary Higher Education: A Theoretical Basis Revealed in Practice, Ed. Gibbs, P. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56185-1_6
  23. Greenfield, S. (2022). Exploring entertainment law’s boundaries: Applying a transdisciplinary approach. Entertainment and Sports Law Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.1099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.1099
  24. Greenfield, S. (2023). Re-thinking the “Juridification” of Sport: Identifying the cognitive dimension. Sport, Law and Philosophy: The Jurisprudence of Sport, Ed. Imbrišević, M. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003096351-11
  25. Grimes, R. (2014). Delivering legal education through an integrated problem-based learning model – the nuts and bolts. International Journal of Clinical Legal Education, 21(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v21i2.388 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v21i2.388
  26. Haslam, M. B. (2021). What might COVID-19 have taught us about the delivery of Nurse Education, in a post-COVID-19 world? Nurse Education Today, 97(104707). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104707
  27. Hunter, C., & Cowan, D. (2012). Integrating socio-legal studies into the law curriculum. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01603-4
  28. Jones, P. (1989). A skills-based approach to professional legal education – an exemplary case. The Law Teacher, 23(2). 173-191. DOI: 10.1080/03069400.1989.9992735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.1989.9992735
  29. Jones, O. D., Wagner, A. D., Faigman, D. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2013). Neuroscientists in court. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(10), 730–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3585
  30. Kerdeman, D. (2003). Pulled up short: Challenging self‐understanding as a focus of teaching and learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(2), 293–308. DOI:10.1111/1467-9752.00327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00327
  31. Knox, J., & Stone, M. (2019). Embedding employability skills for the legal professionals of the future. The Law Teacher, 53(1), 90–101. DOI:10.1080/03069400.2018.1490472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2018.1490472
  32. Landrum, R. E., & Nelsen, L. R. (2002). The undergraduate research assistantship: An analysis of the benefits. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2901_04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2901_04
  33. Lee, J. S., Blackwell, S., Drake, J., & Moran, K. A. (2014). Taking a leap of faith: Redefining teaching and learning in higher education through project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1426
  34. Lucas, U. (2008). Being “pulled up short”: Creating moments of surprise and possibility in accounting education. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(3), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2006.09.004
  35. Mallon, M., & Bernsten, S. (2015). Collaborative learning technologies. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1052.811&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  36. Mason, L., & Guth, J. (2018). Re-claiming our discipline. The Law Teacher, 52(4), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2018.1533163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2018.1533163
  37. McMillan, T. (2020). Concordat for the advancement of knowledge exchange in higher education. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/35393/1/knowledge-exchange-concordat.pdf
  38. Menis, S. (2020). The liberal, the vocational and legal education: a legal history review – from Blackstone to a law degree (1972). The Law Teacher, 54(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2019.1696111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2019.1696111
  39. Mieg, H. A. (2019). Introduction: Inquiry-Based Learning-Initial Assessment. Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research, pp. 1–16. Ed. Mieg, H.A. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0_1
  40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0
  41. Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018). Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001
  42. Moss, D. M. (2013). The hidden curriculum of legal education: Toward a holistic model for reform. J. Disp. Resol.,Vol 1/3 19 -31 https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2013/iss1/3
  43. Nicholson, A. (2020). The value of a law degree. The Law Teacher, 54(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2019.1633117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2019.1633117
  44. Nicholson, A. (2021a). The value of a law degree – part 2: A perspective from UK providers. The Law Teacher, 55(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2020.1781483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2020.1781483
  45. Nicholson, A. (2021b). The value of a law degree – part 4: A perspective from employers. The Law Teacher, 52(4), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1936396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1936396
  46. Nicholson, A., & Johnston, P. (2021). The value of a law degree – part 3: a student perspective. The Law Teacher, 55(4). DOI:10.1080/03069400.2020.1843900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2020.1843900
  47. Nicolescu, B. (1996). La transdisciplinarit´e manifeste. Monaco: Rocher. (English translation: 2002, Manifesto of transdisciplinarity, New York: SUNY Press, translation from the French by K.-C. Voss).
  48. Nicolescu, B. (2014). Methodology of transdisciplinarity. The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 70(3–4), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934631
  49. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
  50. Richardson, K., Butler, J., & Holm, E. (2009). Teaching law to non-law students: The use of problem solving in legal teaching. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 6(2), 29–41.
  51. Sayan, H. (2016). Affecting higher students learning activity by using WhatsApp. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol, 4(3), 88-93.
  52. Sylvester, C. (2015). More questions than answers? A review of the effectiveness of inquiry based learning in higher education. The Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, 10(1), 21–29.
  53. Vinnichenko, O., & Gladun, E. (2018). Legal education in the BRICS countries in the context of globalization: A comparative analysis. BRICS Law Journal, 5(3), 4–39. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-3-4-39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-3-4-39
  54. Wayment, H. A., & Dickson, K. L. (2008). Increasing student participation in undergraduate research benefits students, faculty, and department. Teaching of Psychology, 35(3), 194–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009862830803500307
  55. DOI: 10.1080/00986280802189213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802189213
  56. Williams, S., Armitage, C., Tampe, T., & Dienes, K. (2020). Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A UK-based focus group study. BMJ Open, 10(e039334) 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334
  57. Wolhuter, C., & Chigisheva, O. (2020). The BRICS countries grouping: Promise of a new thematic and methodological research focus in the social sciences and the humanities. Space and Culture, India, 7(5), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i5.606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i5.606
  58. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2020). These are the top 10 job skills of tomorrow – and how long it takes to learn them. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/10/top-10-work-skills-of-tomorrow-how-long-it-takes-to-learn-them/
  59. Wong, Y. J. (2003). Harnessing the potential of problem‐based learning in legal education. The Law Teacher, 37(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2003.9993126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2003.9993126
  60. Wray, S., & Kinman, G. (2021). Supporting staff wellbeing in higher education. https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/11913/ES_Supporting_Staff_Wellbeing_in_HE_Report/pdf/ES_Supporting_Staff_Wellbeing_in_HE_Report.pdf
  61. Zammiello, L. (2021). Don't you know that your law is toxic? Britney Spears and abusive guardianship: revisionary approach to the uniform probate code, California probate code, and Texas estates code to ensure equitable outcomes. Estate Planning & Community Property Law Journal, 13(2), 587–632.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.