Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Iconic Character of Bestiary Images in the Novels of F. Werfel and E. Canetti

Abstract

The anthropomorphic depiction of animals bearing allegorical meanings is the well-represented and actively demanded bestiary of world literature. It reflects the mythological thinking of writers and is an integral part of the worldview basis on which literary works are based. Bestiary images in the artistic text acquire the status of universal representative symbols. This study discusses bestiary images in novelistic works of Austrian writers, Franz Werfel (1890-1945) and Elias Canetti (1905-1994). Using the semiotic approach, the researchers define a range of images and meanings that are related to these two writers as representatives of the era of historical upheavals and individual authorial purposes that reflect the basis of the worldview of each of them. A bestiary image in a literary text can function as an iconic sign, which, on the one hand, reflects the material object in its materiality, and on the other hand, contributes to the emerging of "new", constructed by analogy, aesthetic reality. The similarity to the referent, in this case, is included in the overall system of ontological values. An iconic sign, after Ch.S. Pierce, refers to a simple sign based on the similarity to a thing and participating in the creation of symptoms of a higher order – symbols. Bestiary images in a literary text acquire the status of universal representative characters. The functioning of animal images in the text, their nomination, combinatorics, communication with the elements, time periods, and behavioural patterns are the way of the study of the philosophical foundations of the author's world picture. Canetti’s bestiary is represented by metaphorical images of a monkey, a cat, a pig, and a tortoise, which are used as a tool for analysing various psychic and psychological states of the characters of the novel "Blinding" (Die Blendung, 1931-1932). Multiple forms of anthropopathy and zoomorphism are based on the writer's attitude towards the initial "equality" of man and animal. The study of zoopoetics (the term of J. Lacan) of Werfel’s novel "Barbara, or Piety" (Barbara oder die Frömigkeit, 1929) helps to reveal the axiological foundation upon which the writer constructs his novels. The functioning of images of animals, a horse, for example, is related to the semantics of sacrifice that is rethought and acquiring new meanings in a new historical context. Composite images connecting different characteristics and associated with various natural elements are important. It is apparent that the study of the works by Werfel and Canetti, given the iconic nature of bestiary images, seems relevant to detect common patterns of development of European literature and culture of the first third of the 20th Century.

Keywords

Animal Poetics; Archetypical Consciousness; Bestiary Images; Iconic Sign; Symbol

pdf

References

  1. Angelova, P. (2005). Elias Canetti. Spuren zum mythischen Denken. Wien: Paul Zsolnay.
  2. Addai-Mununkum, R. (2019). Students’ representation of “other” religions. Journal Of Curriculum Studies Research, 1(1), 1-16. Retrieved on 01 January 2019 from, https://curriculumstudies.org/index.php/CS/article/view/2
  3. Bakhtin, M.M. (1997). About Floebert. Collected works М.М. Bakhtina. M.: Russian dictionaries, 5, 130-137.
  4. Bartelmus, M. (2015). Kleists Teichoskopie auf die Moderne. Über Kollektive, Meuten, Subjekte und das Tier-Werden im Trauerspiel Penthesilea, Journal of Literary Theory, 9 (2), 161–185.
  5. Bozhkova G.N., Shastina E.M., Kalimullina O.V., & Shatunova O.V. (2019). Study of literary images of gifted characters in optional activities as a means to develop capable and talented youth, Journal Space and Culture, India, 7(1), 264- 273, https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i1.463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i1.463
  6. Canetti, E. (1988). Blinding: Roman. Transl. by S. Apta. Moscow, Fiction, 496.
  7. Canetti, E. (1999). Die Blendung. Roman. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
  8. Canetti, E. (2002). Über Tiere. Mit einem Nachwort von Brigitte Kronauer. München/Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag.
  9. Derrida J. (2000). About grammar. M .: Ad Marginem
  10. Deleuze J., & Guatari F. (2007). The Thousand Surfaces. Blue sofa. Issue 10/11, Moscow, "Three Squares", 7-15.
  11. Donahue, W.C. (2007). The worlds of Elias Canetti: Centenary Essays. Donahue W.C. & Julian Preece (eds). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, XXVII
  12. Driscoll, K. (2015). The Sticky Temptation of Poetry, Journal of Literary Theory, 9(2), 212–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0011
  13. Hornik, K. (2006). Myth man and cannibals. Bielefeld: Aisthesis
  14. Ivanov, V.V. (1994). Dragon. Myths of the peoples of the world: Encyclopedia. Ed. by S.A. Tolkachev. Moscow: The Russian Encyclopedia, 1, 394-395.
  15. Lvov A.L. (2013). Bestiary and Elements Collection of articles. Moscow: Intrada.
  16. Magsumov, T.A. (2019). Gender Re(e)volution of commercial schools in Russia in the early XX century. Woman in Russian Society, 1, 133-144. doi: 10.21064/WinRS.2019.1.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2019.1.12
  17. Makhov, AE (2011). Medieval image. Between theology and rhetoric. Experience interpreting visual demonology. Moscow: Kulagina-Intrada Publishing House.
  18. Mikhaylin, V., & Reshetnikova, E. (2013).A Little Horse, anthropological notes on the fields of animal studies. Review of foreign books (Electronic resource) UFO. 2013. No. 124. Retrieved on 01 January 2019 from, http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2013/124/29m.html
  19. Norris, M. (1985). Beasts of the Modern Imagination: Darwin, Nietzsche, Kafka, Ernst, & Lawrence, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  20. Pierce, C.S. (2000). Selected philosophical works. Translated by K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze, T. Dmitrieva. Moscow, Logos.
  21. Reiterer, M. (2002). Verzauberung durch Tiere – еine Poetologie der Verschiedenartigkeit. Literatur und Kritik. H. 365-366, 86–87.
  22. Saenko, N., Voronkova, O., Volk, M., & Voroshilova, O. (2019). The social responsibility of a scientist: Philosophical aspect of contemporary discussions. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 332-345.
  23. Seibel N. E., Shastina E.M., Volokitina N.I., & Ziganshina N.F. (2017). The Motive of Death in the Austrian Novel of the Late 1920s – Early 1930s. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 9(2), 164 – 174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v9n2.17
  24. Shastina, E. (2015). "Аnimalistic context" of Elias Canetti. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (S2), 432-437, Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p432
  25. Timmermann, H. (1985). Tierisches in der Anthropologie und Poetik Elias Canettis. Höllerer, 99-126.
  26. Vural, H. (2019). The Relationship of Personality Traits with English Speaking Anxiety. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 1(1), 55-74. Retrieved on 31 December 2019 from, https://repamjournal.org/index.php/REPAM/article/view/9
  27. Werfel, F. (1988). Barbara oder die Frömmigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verl.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)