Formation of Innovative Strategies of Regional Economic Development
The new contours of innovative development of economic systems associated with the appearance of network models of innovation and new types of innovation: social, sustainable, user and inclusive, differ from the traditional approach to the functioning of the raw material model of the economy. The role and place of innovation infrastructure of economic systems in the development of national innovation systems remains paramount. In this research, the essence of the definition of "innovation infrastructure" in relation to economic systems is supplemented and expanded. In doing so, it specifies the factors providing the formation of the infrastructure of innovative activity of the economic systems which have an impact on the innovativeness of elements of economic systems at the micro-, meso- and macro level. The subject-object structure of information infrastructure of innovative activity of economic systems including business environment, innovative environment, information environment and communication environment is proposed. In addition, it also proposes the model of development of infrastructure of innovative activity focused on technological innovations on the basis of implementation of technological platforms. The worked out model of development of technological infrastructure of innovative activity of the economic system (macro level) contains the directions of transformation of the meso- and micro level where a special role is assigned to the creation of free economic zones which contribute to the development of new forms of interaction of the R&D sector with the real sector of the economy, which will increase the susceptibility of the economic system of Russia and society as a whole to innovation and lead to the development of technological entrepreneurship and the formation of an innovative economy of a new type.
Asheim, B.T. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local â€˜Stickyâ€™ and Global â€˜Ubiquitousâ€™ Knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77-86.
Buley, N.V., Demchenko, T.S., Bondaletov, V.V., Bondaletova, N.F., & Makushkin, S.A. (2017). Management policy promotion as element of complex of commercial organizations marketing. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(12), 307-316.
Chang, C.-M. (2012). Factors Affecting Knowledge Management Success: the Fit Perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 847-861.
Dotdueva, Z.S., Gorlov, S.M., Marchenko, E.V., Takhumova, O.V., Kaverzin, S.A., & Sugaipova, I.V. (2016). The methodology for the formation of the regional food-producing clusters. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(6), 27-31
Freeman, Ð¡. (1990). The Economics of Innovation. England: ESDU
Friedmann, J. (1982). World City Formation: An Agenda for Research and Action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6, 309-344.
HÃ¤gerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jansen, F. (2002). Era of Innovation. Moscow: Infra-M.
Jungblut, J. (2016). From Preferences to Policies in Coalition Governments â€“ Unpacking Policy-Making in European Higher Education. Public Policy and Administration, 32(4), 323â€“348.
Kireev, V.S., Nekrasova, M.L., Shevchenko, E.V., Alpatskaya, I.E., Makushkin, S.A., & Povorina, E.V. (2016). Marketing management as the realization process of research, production and sale activity of the enterprise. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(6), 228-234.
Kolesnikov, Yu.A., Pavlyuk, A.V., Radachinsky, Yu.N., & Rodionova, N.D. (2018). Problems of implementation of public-private partnership in Russia. European Research Studies Journal, 21, 187-197.
Lundvall, B.-A. (2011). Innovation Systems and Economic Development, 9na. Conferencia Internacional Globelic. Retrieved from http://www.globelics.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/GWP 2012-01.pdf.
Nonaka, I. (2000). SECI and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33/1, 5-34.
Pencheva, I., Esteve, M., & Mikhaylov, S.J. (2018, 12 June). Big Data and AI â€“ A Transformational Shift for Government: So, What is Next for Research? Public Policy and Administration. Retrieved 20 March 2019 from, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0952076718780537
Porter, M. (2002). Contention. Moscow: Williams.
Porter, Ðœ. (2001). The Competitive Advantage on Nations. New York: Palgrave.
Schumpeter, J. (1982). Theory of Economic Development. Moscow: Progress.
Shashkova, A.V. (2018). Corporations and the State: Emerging of the Problem of Corporate Liability. OpciÃ³n, 34(Special Issue 14), 432-458.
Shcherbakov, V.S. (2017). Iteration as a Regulatory Function of Education Management. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(7b), 1211-1219.
Shekhovtsev, A. (2000). Free Economic Zones: World Experience and Development Prospects in Russia. Economic Issues, 10, 23-33.
Shikhov, A.V. (2009). Information Technology. Service Sales of Finished Products. Dairy Industry, 3, 42-44.
Shitz, M. (2004). In the Union of Education and Science born Russian Nevtony and Plato. Russian Newspaper. Retrieved 15 March 2019 from,http://informika.ru/text/magaz/newpaper/messedu/2004/cour0403/3500.htm.
Silagadze, A. (2017). History of Georgian economic thought: Relation between the center and the region. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences, 11(4), 138-144.
Silagadze, A. (2018). Some aspects of economic ideas in Shota Rustaveliâ€™s â€œthe knight in the panther skinâ€. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences, 12(1), 161-167.
Ushakov, D., Akhmetova, S.G., & Nevskaya, L.V. (2017a). Economic growth and environmental performance: Correlation issues and future priorities. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 38(4), 164-172.
Ushakov, D., Bandurin, V., Bandurin, A. (2017b). Taxation regime as a factor of mutually intergrated macroeconomic systemsâ€™ dynamics. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13(1), 171-179.
Ushakov, D., Elokhova, I., & Kozonogova, E. (2017c). Post industrialization prospects in the dynamics of socioeconomic transformations: Cluster approach. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 38(2), 23-32.
Van, H.T., Huu, A.T., & Ushakov, D. (2017). Liberal reforms and economic growth: Current issues and interrelations. Journal of International Studies, 10(4), 109-118.
Vinichenko, M.V., KarÃ¡csony, P., Demcheko, T.S., Ilina, I.Y., & Makuchkin, S.A. (2017). Improvement of youth personnel policy: Social inspection. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(7): 1069-1077.
Xavier, S.-I-M. (2012). The Global Competitiveness Report. Geneva.
Yakovets, U.V. (2002). The Strategy of Scientific and Innovative Breakthrough. Economist, 5, 3-11.
Yakovets, U.V. (2004). Epochal Innovation of the XXI century. Moscow: Economy.
Yankovsky, K.P. (2006). Organisation of Investment and Innovation. St. Petersburg: Peter.
Copyright (c) 2019 Sergey A. Tronin,Tatiana A. Rodermel, Milana G. Uspaeva, Anna V. Shashkova, and Mauricio Calesci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open Access).